1999/12 A Case Study on Community Learning Centre for Development NEPAL
PDF (97KB)

This case study outlines how CLCs provide a permanent structure for carrying out literacy and continuing education programmes for community development in the remote rural areas of Nepal. The study also provides clear guidelines to ways and means for mobilizing community resources and participation in development activities.



1 Objectives The major Objectives of these CLCs in Nepal are to:
Conduct various educational programmes such as out-of-school youth programmes, literacy, post-literacy and continuing education;
Build and strengthen the capacity of programme organizers, resource persons, trainers and volunteers, etc. ;
Develop training and learning materials;
Provide ownership of decision-making to communities; and
Conduct a host of income generation programmes for promoting self-employment among youths and adults.
2 Partners
NRC-NFE/CEFA - Organizers and implementers of the programme
UNESCO/PROAP, ACCU, and NFUAJ-financial and technical assistance for training and material development.
Sectoral ministries
Several national and international NGOs.
3 Input
Training materials for literacy, post-literacy and income generation programmes.
Women's Saving and credit cooperatives for providing credit to small-scale community-based entrepreneurs.
Guidance and counseling in the field of agriculture, farming, fishery and forestry.
4 Process Training programmes in the methods and techniques for:
Conducting surveys to assess the community needs.
Planning and management of CLCS, programme evaluation, coordination and networking with local organizations.
Designing community-based educational and development programmes.
5 Output
Increased knowledge and skills of the programme participants in general and in the areas of agriculture, forest and fishery related activities.
Increased productivity and income of participants.
Environmental protection through forest conservation and plantation.
Enhanced self-esteem, cooperation and other attitudinal changes, empowerment of women, etc.
6 Strengths
Well trained facilitators and volunteers.
Community-based/learner-based learning materials.
Timely guidance and counseling to participants.
Timing and scheduling of the programme.
Constant liaison with the community and locally elected representatives.
7 Weaknesses
Lack of a well-defined and clear national policy and government involvement in the NFE sub-sector.
Difficult topography and terrain.
Lack of communication and transportation channels.
Limited programmes and activities for girls and women.
Scarcity of financial and other resources.
Interference by government authorities in the day-to-day operation of CLCs.
Lack of commitment, participation, continuity and enthusiasm at all levels of administration.
8 Name of Author & Implementation Organisation
(name) National Resource Centre for Non-Formal Education (NRC-NFE)
(position) -
(organisation name) National Resource Centre for Non-Formal Education/Centre for Education for All
(mailing address)

Talchhikhel, Satdobato, Patan, Lalitpur, NEPAL P.O. Box 270

(phone) 977-1-534 416
(fax) 977-1-541 689
(e-mail) nrc-nfe@acculrc.wlink.com.np
(URL) http://www.accu.or.jp/literacy/nrc_nfe/top_page.htm




Your feed-back / comments to education@accu.or.jp



Copyright (c) UNESCO and the Asia/Pacific Cultural Centre for UNESCO, 2000