| 1 |
Objectives |
The main Objectives of the project are:
 |
To change from a "campaign" approach for eradicating
illiteracy - to a "continuing education" approach that provides
time for learners to develop functional literacy competency; |
 |
To change from a "book-centred" approach that
delivers a national curriculum - to a "learner-centred" approach
that is based on the needs of learners and the problems and potentials
of each community; and |
 |
To change from a "bureaucracy-based" approach
where DIKMAS identified targets and delivers programmes - to a "community-based
learning centre" approach where communities form learning groups
based on local needs. |
|
| 2 |
Partners |
 |
Directorate of Community Education (DIKMAS) |
|
| 3 |
Input |
 |
Literacy primers for developing skills in reading,
writing and numeracy. |
 |
Trained facilitators/volunteers. |
|
| 4 |
Process |
The entire Process engages the participants in a new way
of thinking and doing literacy education, not merely "transfer knowledge"
about a new approach. Simulation exercise, practice session or field activity
as well as discussion of the theory behind the method accompany the presentation
of each new teaching method. The Process involves the following major
steps:
 |
Effective cooperation and bottom-up strategy; |
 |
Training of trainers; |
 |
Community support; |
 |
Tutor training; |
 |
Self-managed learning groups; |
 |
Integrated evaluation; and |
 |
Active support system. |
|
| 5 |
Output |
The end result of the training Process is the creation
of self-managed learning groups that can plan and implement their own
functional literacy activities. The major outcomes of the programme include:
 |
Formation of learning groups; |
 |
Trained tutors - as key planners, implementers,
and evaluators who guide the learners in planning and doing the
learning activities; |
 |
Community educators and district learning centres
(SKB); |
 |
Development of learning materials; |
 |
Formation of field workers as supervisors at the
sub-district level; |
 |
Committed leaders, administrative staff and supervisors.
|
 |
Future Plan; |
 |
Recognizing the need for increased training; |
 |
Coordinating the planning Process for the training
budget; |
 |
Developing a competent team of master trainers for
each province; |
 |
Organizing field-based training workshops for each
district; and |
 |
Integrating functional literacy programme training
with other programmes. |
|
| 6 |
Strengths |
 |
Concrete goals; |
 |
Use of local training sites; |
 |
Emphasis on quality over quantity; |
 |
Training schedule based on the local conditions; |
 |
Sufficient materials and adequate workforce; |
 |
Team spirit; |
 |
Support for follow-up activities; and |
 |
Committed administrators and project leaders. |
|
| 7 |
Weaknesses |
- |
| 8 |
Name of Author & Implementation Organisation |
| (name) |
Directorate of Community Education |
| (position) |
- |
| (organisation name) |
Directorate General of Out of School Education, Youth and
Sport |
| (mailing address) |
Directorate General of Out of School Education, Youth and Sport Department
of National Education J1, Jenderal Sudirman, Senayan, Jakarta, INDONESIA
|
| (phone) |
62-21-572550-2, 5725507, 5725716
|
| (fax) |
62-21-5725039 |
| (e-mail) |
-
|
| (URL) |
- |